←back to thread

210 points benbreen | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
1. tempodox ◴[] No.41085202[source]
Too bad “hean” was a misspelling. A hitherto unknown mythical bird would have been even more interesting. Or was it a species that became extinct?
replies(2): >>41085589 #>>41087410 #
2. veltas ◴[] No.41085589[source]
Standard spelling was only being proposed around this time, so it's not a misspelling.
replies(1): >>41088293 #
3. SoftTalker ◴[] No.41087410[source]
I was suprised to see that claimed as a misspelling. The lettering was very neat, nearly perfect otherwise, so with that evident attention to detail I thought a misspelling was unlikely. I assumed it was just an older variation of the spelling.
4. maronato ◴[] No.41088293[source]
The article says it is a misspelling.
replies(1): >>41088720 #
5. thechao ◴[] No.41088720{3}[source]
The fact that misspelling doesn't have 3 s's is one of the great tragedies of English orthography.

> missspelling