←back to thread

Reflection for C++26

(isocpp.org)
196 points svlasov | 1 comments | 30 Jun 24 11:26 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
kstrauser ◴[01 Jul 24 23:50 UTC] No.40852102[source]▶
I haven't touched C++ since undergrad. Neither have I written any Qt code. But from memory, doesn't Qt's moc implement some of this stuff because it wasn't available in C++? Could this replace moc?
replies(4): >>40852283 #>>40852302 #>>40852535 #>>40854005 #
self_awareness ◴[02 Jul 24 06:19 UTC] No.40854005[source]▶
I've always wondered what's the point of "replacing moc". I mean what's the problem with moc? It's required by Qt, and completely transparent by the build system. You don't even know it's used.

I mean, GCC also has some helper tools used to compile C++ code and we don't talk about "replacing them".

Why people want to remove moc from Qt?

replies(2): >>40854995 #>>40856447 #
1. jhasse ◴[02 Jul 24 09:49 UTC] No.40854995[source]▶
Bugs that come with it.