←back to thread

229 points modinfo | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.214s | source
Show context
SeanAnderson ◴[] No.40834703[source]
This doesn't seem useful unless it's something standardized across browsers. Otherwise I'd still need to use a plugin to support safari, etc.

It seems like it could be nice for something like a bookmarklet or a one-off script, but I don't think it'll really reduce friction in engaging with Gemini for serious web apps.

replies(5): >>40834719 #>>40834754 #>>40834763 #>>40834819 #>>40834952 #
1. zmmmmm ◴[] No.40834819[source]
By default, the W3C process actually requires multiple implementations before something is supposed to be standardised. So it is actually necessary that browser vendors ship vendor-specific implementations before the standards process can properly consider things like this.

If Mozilla jumps on board and makes a compatible implementation that back ends to eg: local llama then you would have the preconditions necessary for it to become standardised. As long as Google hasn't booby trapped it by making it somehow highly specific to chrome / google / Gemini etc.