(dfarq.homeip.net)

235 points rbanffy | 1 comments | 21 Jun 24 22:22 UTC | HN request time: 0.249s | source

Show context

throw0101d ◴[22 Jun 24 22:24 UTC] No.40762764[source]▶

As one of my last monitors before LCDs took over, I had a 21-inch Sun, and boy was that sucker heavy (>30 kgs (>65 lbs)):

* https://dogemicrosystems.ca/pub/Sun/System_Handbook/Sun_sysh...

replies(9): >>40762930 #>>40763565 #>>40763701 #>>40763857 #>>40763913 #>>40764768 #>>40765098 #>>40765854 #>>40777462 #

marcus0x62 ◴[23 Jun 24 01:29 UTC] No.40763857[source]▶

>>40762764 #

I had a 21” Viewsonic in the late 90s, with an enormous (for the time) 1600x1200 resolution. It weighed around 60 pounds. My desk sagged in the middle from the weight of the monitor.

replies(2): >>40763983 #>>40764531 #

AuryGlenz ◴[23 Jun 24 01:49 UTC] No.40763983[source]▶

>>40763857 #

I had something similar, though it was maybe a Trinitron? The glass was also flat. It was a long, long time until it felt worth it to “upgrade” to an LCD screen.

replies(2): >>40764415 #>>40769291 #

1. marcus0x62 ◴[23 Jun 24 18:02 UTC] No.40769291[source]▶

>>40763983 #

The trinitrons were great, but way beyond my budget at the time. I seem to remember at work we had a nice Trinitron with a flat screen that had 13w3 and vga inputs. IIRC, it was bought as a "budget" monitor for a Sun workstation, but was still like twice as much as my Viewsonic.

↑

The biggest CRT ever made: Sony's PVM-4300