←back to thread

235 points rbanffy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.21s | source
Show context
MenhirMike ◴[] No.40762400[source]
I'm kinda curious if CRT technology advanced to the point where a TV like that would've been possible at a better weight and price tag? I assume that CRT technology development stopped decades ago, but could we have e.g., replaced the heavy glass with some plastic-like material to save weight without compromising the picture? And are there any heavy components in the mechanism itself (Coils, Magnets?) that would have had alternatives?

I know it's just theorycrafting, but I do wonder what kind of CRT someone could've created if it wasn't for market economy forces.

replies(7): >>40762471 #>>40762611 #>>40762862 #>>40762908 #>>40763349 #>>40763829 #>>40764554 #
perihelions ◴[] No.40763349[source]
On top of the mechanical issues, CRT glass also functions as x-ray shielding, for which reason it is leaded (Pb). You can't really make that part lighter.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathode-ray_tube#Body

https://www.epa.gov/hw/frequent-questions-about-regulation-u...

(This isn't really an answer to the overall question—just a narrow observation of interest).

replies(2): >>40764349 #>>40766537 #
throwaway2037 ◴[] No.40766537[source]
This is an interesting point. Does anyone know how much lead would be in a 21 inch monitor?
replies(1): >>40766992 #
1. RetroSpark ◴[] No.40766992[source]
According to [0], about 1.2 kg (2.6 lbs). Surprisingly this is mostly in the neck and funnel of the tube - the screen itself uses different metals because lead would affect its optical performance.

[0] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187802961...