←back to thread

235 points rbanffy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.342s | source
Show context
esprehn ◴[] No.40763941[source]
My parents had a Sony KV-40XBR700, the 40in 300lb CRT. I thought it was the largest you could buy until learning about the even larger one in TFA.

The picture quality on the KV-40XBR700 was amazing for the era (~2003). My Dad cleverly cut a hole into the wall up high and stuck the TV into it, then put a picture frame around it giving us one of the first "high definition flat screens" even if it was an illusion.

Of course these days our 43in TV weighs less than 20lbs and is mounted with a couple small wall anchors.

replies(5): >>40764494 #>>40764510 #>>40764550 #>>40764696 #>>40768451 #
mikepurvis ◴[] No.40764510[source]
And wild to think that nowadays 43” is on the smaller side even for a non home theatre “living room” TV— the standard is much more around 55”.
replies(2): >>40764572 #>>40765551 #
TylerE ◴[] No.40764572[source]
Seems like every time I've bought one "standard" has moved up a size. My current is a 65", the one before that a 55", a 47" before that, and I think a 43 or 44 before that.
replies(2): >>40764704 #>>40772956 #
1. mikepurvis ◴[] No.40764704[source]
Yup, I have a 65” 1080p panel that came with my house and looking at a 77” 4K OLED to replace it.