←back to thread

181 points EndXA | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.252s | source
Show context
oldandtired ◴[] No.40727644[source]
Here in Victoria (Australia), we commonly see road signs stating that "speed kills" whereas the reality is that it is the jerk that kills.
replies(6): >>40727787 #>>40730372 #>>40730404 #>>40733606 #>>40737628 #>>40746179 #
Gooblebrai ◴[] No.40727787[source]
If you want to be pedantic, you could argue that it is the collision that kills.
replies(2): >>40727961 #>>40732382 #
samatman ◴[] No.40732382[source]
It isn't, though. It's the jerk.

The difference between falling from a height and landing on a trampoline, and landing on concrete from the same height, is that the trampoline smoothly accelerates you to a halt once you collide with it. The concrete does so much more rapidly: that's jerk. Both of these are collisions with the same amount of force behind them.

replies(1): >>40737651 #
rcxdude ◴[] No.40737651[source]
No, it's the acceleration. The forces are absolutely different between your two examples. The energy is the same, but in one case the energy is dissipated over a longer time, requiring less acceleration and thus force. Jerk and acceleration will tend to be correlated in collisions, but you can construct cases with very high jerk and low acceleration which are just fine and cases with very high acceleration and low jerk which are not at all safe, though the latter case will generally require a lot more energy (fighter jets and rockets, for example).
replies(2): >>40739171 #>>40739603 #
1. ◴[] No.40739171[source]