←back to thread

Beyond velocity and acceleration: jerk, snap and higher derivatives (2016)

(iopscience.iop.org)
181 points EndXA | 1 comments | 19 Jun 24 10:16 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
londons_explore ◴[19 Jun 24 11:39 UTC] No.40727286[source]▶
I wish designers of vehicles - particularly cars, trains and busses, would work to minimize jerk, snap and crackle.

Turns out if you minimize those, you get a far more comfortable ride. It matters far more than acceleration.

Finite element models of the whole system (tyres and suspension components and flexing elements of the vehicle body and road/track) can quickly allow analysis of the jerk, snap and crackle, and allow tuning of damping and drive system control loops to make a far more comfortable ride.

replies(3): >>40727304 #>>40728030 #>>40730913 #
1. owisd ◴[19 Jun 24 18:14 UTC] No.40730913[source]▶
It's designed for in the road/track, not the vehicle. For train tracks in the UK the recommended max jerk is 0.35 mm/s/s/s. The jerk is limited by using 'Euler spiral' sections to join up the straights and the curves. Travelling along an Euler spiral at constant speed means you feel constant jerk laterally, so can be scaled to keep the jerk below any arbitrary value.