←back to thread

Beyond velocity and acceleration: jerk, snap and higher derivatives (2016)

(iopscience.iop.org)
181 points EndXA | 1 comments | 19 Jun 24 10:16 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
marginalia_nu ◴[19 Jun 24 11:14 UTC] No.40727129[source]▶
Do these higher order derivatives say anything meaningful?

I always got the sense from physics that outside of purely mathematical constructions such as Taylor series, higher order time derivatives aren't providing much interesting information. Though I'm not sure whether this is the inherent laziness of physicist math[1] or a property of the forces in nature.

[1] since e^x = 1 + x is generally true, why'd you even need a second order derivative

replies(8): >>40727177 #>>40727207 #>>40727251 #>>40727544 #>>40728112 #>>40730807 #>>40734568 #>>40735594 #
fellerts ◴[19 Jun 24 11:26 UTC] No.40727207[source]▶
Jerk (how fast acceleration changes) is useful. I've found being a passenger in newer electric buses to pose more challenges than ICE buses because EVs can change their acceleration so rapidly. While their maximum acceleration isn't very high, they can go from standstill to accelerating in a split second, toppling anyone standing unless they hold on to something. ICEs need more time to reach maximum acceleration. In other words, EVs jerk more.
replies(3): >>40727396 #>>40727411 #>>40727540 #
playingalong ◴[19 Jun 24 11:56 UTC] No.40727396[source]▶
How do you know this is not second derivative (acceleration), but the third or higher?

Genuinely curious.

replies(3): >>40728329 #>>40728502 #>>40737550 #
1. myrmidon ◴[19 Jun 24 14:13 UTC] No.40728502{3}[source]▶
Constant acceleration as bus passenger can be fully compensated by just leaning at an angle. This is not unpleasant.

But if the jerk (or higher derivatives) are non-zero, you have to change your "lean angle" quickly to avoid getting jerked around (which is obviously much more disruptive).