Beyond velocity and acceleration: jerk, snap and higher derivatives (2016)

(iopscience.iop.org)

181 points EndXA | 1 comments | 19 Jun 24 10:16 UTC | HN request time: 0.202s | source

Show context

londons_explore ◴[19 Jun 24 11:39 UTC] No.40727286[source]▶

I wish designers of vehicles - particularly cars, trains and busses, would work to minimize jerk, snap and crackle.

Turns out if you minimize those, you get a far more comfortable ride. It matters far more than acceleration.

Finite element models of the whole system (tyres and suspension components and flexing elements of the vehicle body and road/track) can quickly allow analysis of the jerk, snap and crackle, and allow tuning of damping and drive system control loops to make a far more comfortable ride.

replies(3): >>40727304 #>>40728030 #>>40730913 #

amelius ◴[19 Jun 24 11:42 UTC] No.40727304[source]▶

>>40727286 #

Do you have proof for that, or is this like audiophiles asking for gold connectors because "they make the sound better"?

replies(7): >>40727367 #>>40727380 #>>40727443 #>>40727865 #>>40727925 #>>40727926 #>>40728053 #

1. constantcrying ◴[19 Jun 24 13:22 UTC] No.40728053[source]▶

>>40727304 #

>Do you have proof for that, or is this like audiophiles asking for gold connectors because "they make the sound better"?

The proof is that roughly 100% of cars have components designed to limit this.

↑