←back to thread

Cyber Scarecrow

(www.cyberscarecrow.com)
606 points toby_tw | 1 comments | 18 Jun 24 08:08 UTC | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
scosman ◴[18 Jun 24 08:25 UTC] No.40715334[source]▶
Fun concept.

If the creators read this, I suggest some ways of building trust. There’s no “about us”, no GitHub link, etc. It’s a random webpage that wants my personal details, and sends me a “exe”. The overlap of people who understand what this tool does, and people who would run that “exe” is pretty small.

replies(7): >>40715364 #>>40715425 #>>40715446 #>>40715473 #>>40716059 #>>40716538 #>>40723731 #
vmfunction ◴[18 Jun 24 08:32 UTC] No.40715364[source]▶
It is a cat and mouse game. And security by obscurity practice. Not saying it won't work, but if it is open sourced, how long before the malware will catch on?

Here is one on github:

https://github.com/NavyTitanium/Fake-Sandbox-Artifacts

replies(7): >>40715392 #>>40715530 #>>40715603 #>>40715668 #>>40716144 #>>40716690 #>>40716934 #
1. self_awareness ◴[18 Jun 24 09:29 UTC] No.40715668[source]▶
Some malware will catch on, some will not. It's a cost vs profit problem. Statistically, this will always decrease the number of possible malware samples that can be installed on the machine, but by what margin? Impossible to say.