←back to thread

273 points geox | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.77s | source
Show context
johnnylambada ◴[] No.40713507[source]
It’s fascinating to think about the number of PUs (procedural units) it takes to make a modern tool. Something as simple as a modern hammer must number in the thousands and a mobile phone in the millions or billions.
replies(4): >>40713950 #>>40714213 #>>40714382 #>>40720749 #
alun ◴[] No.40714382[source]
You might find the essay "I, Pencil" by Leonard Read interesting. It's told from the point of view of a pencil who talks about the complexity of his own creation and all of the components involved in the process
replies(4): >>40714437 #>>40714843 #>>40715043 #>>40718140 #
1. Anotheroneagain ◴[] No.40715043[source]
It's just ideological drivel. People never had any difficulty to cooperate on such level.
replies(2): >>40717305 #>>40717840 #
2. Cthulhu_ ◴[] No.40717305[source]
Except for over 300.000 years ago.
3. feedforward ◴[] No.40717840[source]
One part of the drivel - he says don't let the government inhibit the invisible hand of the market that Adam Smith discusses in The Wealth of Nations. But in The Wealth of Nations, the invisible hand is the hand of the government inhibiting free trade between nations.
replies(1): >>40718035 #
4. Anotheroneagain ◴[] No.40718035[source]
It gets inhibited by the banking system anyway, you would at least have to adopt the Chicago plan (full reserve banking) to avoid it. As it is now, it's about who gets given the money, rather than anything similar to free market.