←back to thread

273 points geox | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.234s | source
Show context
johnnylambada ◴[] No.40713507[source]
It’s fascinating to think about the number of PUs (procedural units) it takes to make a modern tool. Something as simple as a modern hammer must number in the thousands and a mobile phone in the millions or billions.
replies(4): >>40713950 #>>40714213 #>>40714382 #>>40720749 #
levocardia ◴[] No.40713950[source]
That idea is pretty similar to "assembly theory" no? In the sense of how much information or evolution was necessary to generate some artifact, be it a benzene molecule, a stone tool, or an iphone
replies(2): >>40714354 #>>40716517 #
1. visarga ◴[] No.40714354[source]
It took humans 300k years, all of us, our collective output to reach this point. Yet people insist on comparing a human who is part of society with a LLM alone, who doesn't even have search, and very limited contexts, just closed book mode remembering.
replies(3): >>40714368 #>>40715133 #>>40715409 #
2. lifeofguenter ◴[] No.40714368[source]
Who is comparing LLM with Humans?

As far as I can tell nobody is.

LLM is a great tool that helps our brains same way a hammer helps our hands.

3. namaria ◴[] No.40715133[source]
You seem to be hallucinating a strawman
4. jstanley ◴[] No.40715409[source]
Wrong thread, perhaps?