←back to thread

585 points mocko | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.409s | source
Show context
ak217 ◴[] No.4024347[source]
[2008] "Optimism, pessimism, fuck that; we're going to make it happen. As God is my bloody witness, I'm hell-bent on making it work." (http://www.wired.com/science/space/news/2008/08/musk_qa)

Elon Musk doesn't seem like the easiest person to work with, but I'm having a hard time thinking of a more accomplished human.

replies(3): >>4024508 #>>4024633 #>>4026642 #
morsch ◴[] No.4024508[source]
The enthusiasm shown for this accomplishment on Hacker News is borderline ridiculous. This comment seems particularly over the top to me. What does this even mean, how do you measure the attribute of "being accomplished" on a 1d scale across vastly different kinds of accomplishment? To me it seems obvious that some of the medical accomplishments of the past 100 years are easily and vastly more important than a private space launch, but I wouldn't normally compare those things in such a manner. I had to rewrite this paragraph multiple times because it feels so bizarre. I haven't even touched on the question whether and to what degree you can ascribe an accomplishment of a group of people to an individual, which makes the whole comparison even stranger and less meaningful.

I mean, I guess some people here subscribe to the notion that space travel is imperative for human survival. In that case, you might argue that each step towards it is more valuable than anything else that does not immediately push towards human space travel. Human space travel will save humanity, your piddly vaccine only saves a couple of hundred million people. But that seems a bizarre argument to make (and maybe that's why one really makes it).

Edit: -3 in one hour? Wow. For what it's worth, I made this comment in good faith.

replies(11): >>4024576 #>>4024663 #>>4024675 #>>4024690 #>>4024761 #>>4024834 #>>4024886 #>>4025082 #>>4025382 #>>4025495 #>>4025899 #
1. tobtoh ◴[] No.4024675[source]
I think if you are comparing 'accomplishments' based on 'lives saved', then your comment has a lot of validity.

But to me, the reason the SpaceX success is so noteworthy is that that achievement isn't just new, but ground breaking on so many levels.

* first time a private firm has created, launched and docked a space craft

* done it on a budget several magnitudes less than ever done before

* done it with a fraction of the staff than conventionally used

* opened a new era in space development

Whilst I'm being grossly unfair to medical researchers, at a simplistic level I see most new vaccines like the release of a new model of car - beneficial, but incremental development . Whereas I see the SpaceX achievement as something that broke all the conventional wisdom on how things could be done.

And that's what makes it so special and worth celebrating a bit more than other accomplishments.