←back to thread

662 points JacobHenner | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.593s | source
Show context
mannyv ◴[] No.40214223[source]
One major effect of this is that weed stores will be able to use banks and payment processors legally once the regulators catch up.
replies(17): >>40214302 #>>40214371 #>>40214681 #>>40214723 #>>40214802 #>>40214840 #>>40215087 #>>40215094 #>>40215242 #>>40215259 #>>40215926 #>>40216092 #>>40216174 #>>40217047 #>>40217090 #>>40218919 #>>40227379 #
andrewxdiamond ◴[] No.40214371[source]
A lot of them have wiggled around this problem by offering “atms” at the cash register. You pay with a debit card, but it’s not a normal transaction, it’s an ATM withdrawal! I don’t understand how the money is vended to the business, but it keeps it out of the store
replies(8): >>40214632 #>>40214642 #>>40214762 #>>40214782 #>>40214788 #>>40214845 #>>40217657 #>>40218370 #
bobthepanda ◴[] No.40214788[source]
there is still a lot of cash on site due to the presence of an ATM though, and in the cash registers. the primary problem is that weed shops are incredibly attractive robbery targets due to being one of the few businesses in 2024 that handle large amounts of cash.
replies(4): >>40214821 #>>40214926 #>>40216043 #>>40217348 #
mattmaroon ◴[] No.40216043[source]
My brother supervises at a dispensary. They are not attractive robbery targets at all. They have a lot of security. Like a bank, they expect the amount of cash would bring trouble if they were not prepared. Unlike a bank, they don't dispense much cash (just petty change) so they don't even have to leave much in the drawers, which are emptied frequently and dropped into a safe nobody there can access.

They have cash-handling processes similar to a casino, but again, they have much less than a casino or bank to take.

Employee theft is a much bigger problem than robbery, because you can imagine who works at them, but even then, it's hard to get away with.

You'd be much better off robbing a busy gas station or the like.

replies(3): >>40216199 #>>40216348 #>>40216757 #
flawsofar ◴[] No.40216199[source]
> you can imagine who works at them

This is disgracefully elitist. White collar crime hurts more people.

replies(4): >>40216652 #>>40218302 #>>40218969 #>>40219102 #
mattmaroon ◴[] No.40218302[source]
I see why you would say that, but you probably have not met very many people who work at a dispensary, I have. My brother got promoted to supervisor in a month for the simple reason that he is the only person who could wait until after work to get high.

He’s told me quite a bit of what goes on there, and I am sure different dispensaries are different, but in any state where it is relatively recently legalized and there aren’t that many, it’s just the biggest stoners working there. You would have to be kind of special to decide to steal things with that much security around, they always get caught

replies(2): >>40218967 #>>40220333 #
DonHopkins ◴[] No.40220333[source]
Which is why if you want to steal from dispensaries, just work in security, like your brother. Who's to say he's not stealing, and simply not bragging to you about it?
replies(1): >>40221459 #
mattmaroon ◴[] No.40221459[source]
I said he’s a supervisor, not in security. He’s not an idiot. He’d be caught very quickly. Cash controls are such that everyone is.

I don’t know if every state is like mine, but here they have to do complete inventory every night. You can steal but they’ll know it happened by the end of the day and then start checking the footage. It happens.

replies(1): >>40222691 #
flawsofar ◴[] No.40222691[source]
Thank god he was smart enough to avoid becoming a security guard, the natural path to thievery.

But he is high every single moment at work by your reasoning, yes?

replies(1): >>40225777 #
mattmaroon ◴[] No.40225777[source]
I’m not sure you even read the comment you were replying to. Click “parent” a few times and you’ll see “My brother got promoted to supervisor in a month for the simple reason that he is the only person who could wait until after work to get high.”
replies(2): >>40231500 #>>40231636 #
1. flawsofar ◴[] No.40231500[source]
yeah and you missed the irony mocking that very comment