←back to thread

662 points JacobHenner | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.287s | source
Show context
ein0p ◴[] No.40220087[source]
I’d rather the regime let Assange go, and pardoned Snowden. Allowing something most states already allow is weak sauce as far as populism is concerned.
replies(2): >>40220548 #>>40220628 #
almostgotcaught ◴[] No.40220548[source]
do you know how many poor people get caught up on mj charges every year in this country? not to mention this will lead to prior charges being expunged from people's records. but sure let's prioritize those two guys.
replies(2): >>40220615 #>>40226081 #
graphe ◴[] No.40220615[source]
Very short sighted thinking. If they beheaded Sam bankman fried there will be a clear message to not commit financial crime, and the aspiration and motivation would almost zero.

The gesture of the freeing these two brave whistleblowers is much more important than you think. Noam Chomsky calls this censorship flak of his five filters.

> If you want to challenge power, you’ll be pushed to the margins. When the media – journalists, whistleblowers, sources – stray away from the consensus, they get ‘flak’. This is the fourth filter. When the story is inconvenient for the powers that be, you’ll see the flak machine in action discrediting sources, trashing stories and diverting the conversation.

replies(3): >>40220674 #>>40220782 #>>40220788 #
1. skrebbel ◴[] No.40220674[source]
But why not both?