←back to thread

662 points JacobHenner | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.214s | source
Show context
starspangled ◴[] No.40219850[source]
The greatest thing about tight, upcoming elections is that governments actually start to do a tiny bit of what people want. Great result.
replies(7): >>40219858 #>>40219925 #>>40219956 #>>40220471 #>>40220553 #>>40220596 #>>40220713 #
romeros ◴[] No.40219956[source]
It leaves a bad taste in the mouth, doesn't it? Why haven't they taken action until now? People aren't children to be appeased by such gestures.
replies(11): >>40220041 #>>40220044 #>>40220052 #>>40220067 #>>40220231 #>>40220305 #>>40220438 #>>40220475 #>>40220552 #>>40220576 #>>40220735 #
1. atoav ◴[] No.40220475[source]
If you want to fix things you need to give parties with a track record¹ of improving things a significant majority.

I like to see democracy as a system that in it's most basic mode of participation is more like a negative right: You don't wish for a thing and get it, instead you can prevent things you don't want from happening again. That is why track record should be much more important than promises. Nowadays the political debate in the US seems to be even beyond promises: it has become purely symbolic where they expect you to fill in the blanks.

If you want more specific things from your democracy you have to invest more time, vote in local elections, maybe run yourself, write to representatives etc. This is especially the thing you should do if you are unhappy with all options. Earn your right to complain.

¹ what they say doesn't count at all — check their track record, laws they passed, how numbers developed during their last governing period in comparison to neighbouring countries etc.