←back to thread

662 points JacobHenner | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.492s | source
Show context
andrewxdiamond ◴[] No.40213760[source]
Weed being illegal on a federal level has had some interesting effects. Because of these laws, all legal weed has to be grown, processed, and retailed within a single state. So much industry and local employment has been created by the legal barriers in place.

It’s probably still a net positive to release the federal restriction, but I hope all these small/mid sized businesses don’t get gulped up by big tobacco or other mega corps

replies(18): >>40213812 #>>40214163 #>>40214201 #>>40214244 #>>40214266 #>>40214279 #>>40214281 #>>40214722 #>>40214865 #>>40215132 #>>40215210 #>>40215250 #>>40215640 #>>40215792 #>>40218541 #>>40219533 #>>40222689 #>>40228530 #
cryptonector ◴[] No.40215210[source]
Under Wickard even all-in-state marijuana trade would still fall under the Interstate Commerce clause and be subject to federal criminal statutes, regulations, and taxes.
replies(2): >>40215562 #>>40220039 #
1. AuryGlenz ◴[] No.40220039[source]
My one big Supreme Court wish is that Wickard gets shot down. I could actually see it happen with the current court.
replies(1): >>40224186 #
2. cryptonector ◴[] No.40224186[source]
Wickard does seem pretty gross.