←back to thread

662 points JacobHenner | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mannyv ◴[] No.40214223[source]
One major effect of this is that weed stores will be able to use banks and payment processors legally once the regulators catch up.
replies(17): >>40214302 #>>40214371 #>>40214681 #>>40214723 #>>40214802 #>>40214840 #>>40215087 #>>40215094 #>>40215242 #>>40215259 #>>40215926 #>>40216092 #>>40216174 #>>40217047 #>>40217090 #>>40218919 #>>40227379 #
defiamazing ◴[] No.40214840[source]
I don’t get why they don’t just use Bitcoin or Ethereum.
replies(5): >>40214998 #>>40215676 #>>40216913 #>>40218613 #>>40220353 #
kstrauser ◴[] No.40214998[source]
Mainly because your employees, suppliers, and landlord have no desire to be paid in Bitcoin.
replies(1): >>40216607 #
AnthonyMouse ◴[] No.40216607[source]
What does that matter? You can convert Bitcoin into cash. But then you can do that in an undisclosed location at your leisure instead of keeping a mountain of cash in your publicly advertised storefront location and becoming a huge robbery target.

Also, it doesn't seem like it would be that hard to find someone to accept it as payment, since they can convert it to cash too. And the sort of landlords/suppliers/employees willing to do business with a dispensary seem like exactly the sort who would accept Bitcoin.

replies(4): >>40216982 #>>40216983 #>>40217340 #>>40217503 #
buildsjets ◴[] No.40216982[source]
No sane person uses Bitcoin as a currency because it is a fundamentally unsound ponzi scheme for suckers. I don't want my salary to be subject to the vagaries and manipulations of the Bitcoin exchange rate.
replies(3): >>40217387 #>>40217710 #>>40219876 #
1. emptysongglass ◴[] No.40219876[source]
There are plenty of sane people who use Bitcoin as a currency. Making blithe moral declarations like this doesn't spark curiosity and is incredibly tired after so many years (you're not the first).

"Unsound ponzi scheme" could just as well be applied to any fiat currency. It has all the same rules (early entrants are more privileged in "the game" and can invest to out-perform younger players). It is very odd to hear people applying such qualitative judgments like this when the alternative is a currency that is actively debased by its issuers. Or do you think the inflation we've all suffered under isn't a problem?