←back to thread

662 points JacobHenner | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
qwerty456127 ◴[] No.40218673[source]
Great news. A very sound move. Indeed, marijuana is much less dangerous of a drug yet considerably harmful in cases of chronic use in unreasonably high doses therefore should be controlled some way. What seems problematic nowadays is teenagers smoking too much. Also the idea of stoned people driving cars sounds scary. To me it seems it should be as available and legal as alcohol and cigarettes are, no less, no more.

What I'm curious about is how marijuana availability links to consumption of other drugs including hard drugs, alcohol, tobacco, tranquilizers and antidepressants. I hypothesize it may decrease these.

replies(6): >>40218782 #>>40218799 #>>40219267 #>>40219272 #>>40219419 #>>40228581 #
xeonmc ◴[] No.40218799[source]
The biggest problem is not the self-harm aspect but rather the social ramifications.

Regulations and social expectations of where you can smoke should be as-strict as tobacco smoking, if not more since weed is just so much more stinky.

replies(4): >>40218845 #>>40219066 #>>40219859 #>>40220930 #
bdhess ◴[] No.40219066[source]
Stinky is very qualitative. Maybe you grew up around tobacco smokers and so don’t mind the smell? I hate it.

Quantitatively, marijuana smoke is less carcinogenic than tobacco smoke.

replies(2): >>40219101 #>>40219368 #
1. xeonmc ◴[] No.40219368[source]
I hate both. Hence I said it should be as strict, if not more.