←back to thread

Pydantic Logfire

(pydantic.dev)
146 points ellieh | 1 comments | 30 Apr 24 15:56 UTC | HN request time: 0.219s | source
Show context
serjester ◴[30 Apr 24 16:18 UTC] No.40212723[source]▶
I love pydantic but I really have to wonder why they chose this route. There's already a ton of companies that do this really well and I'm trying to figure out how their solution is any different.

The llm integration seems promising but if you care about LLM observability you probably also care about evals, guardrails and a million other things that are very specific to LLM's. Is it possible to build all this under one platform?

I do hope I'm wrong for the sake of pydantic-core.

replies(3): >>40212966 #>>40214112 #>>40214695 #
wferrell ◴[30 Apr 24 18:06 UTC] No.40214112[source]▶
Who do you like who does this well?

I think Pydantic is great software and so I am inclined to see if this too will be great software.

replies(3): >>40214480 #>>40215321 #>>40219124 #
1. OutOfHere ◴[01 May 24 03:15 UTC] No.40219124[source]▶
This is more a service than it is software. It can't independently be used as a software without relying on their service.