←back to thread

662 points JacobHenner | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mannyv ◴[] No.40214223[source]
One major effect of this is that weed stores will be able to use banks and payment processors legally once the regulators catch up.
replies(17): >>40214302 #>>40214371 #>>40214681 #>>40214723 #>>40214802 #>>40214840 #>>40215087 #>>40215094 #>>40215242 #>>40215259 #>>40215926 #>>40216092 #>>40216174 #>>40217047 #>>40217090 #>>40218919 #>>40227379 #
beaeglebeachh ◴[] No.40214681[source]
How? It's still federally illegal to sell schedule 3 to consumers without a DEA licensed rx and dea licensing. The banks would still be knowingly in conspiracy to transmit illegal drug money and a litany of felonies for recreational or purely state-licensed 'medical'.
replies(1): >>40214930 #
mannyv ◴[] No.40214930[source]
You can sell schedule 3 drugs to consumers. Pharmacies do this all the time.
replies(1): >>40214961 #
beaeglebeachh ◴[] No.40214961[source]
'without a DEA licensed rx and dea licensing'

Rx under DEA scrutiny is nothing like rec or laughable state controlled medical 'recommendations'. You pull that shit as a provider on controlled scripts and your charts get audited, your DEA license gets pulled.

replies(3): >>40215420 #>>40217780 #>>40218804 #
1. int_19h ◴[] No.40217780[source]
I think the point is that banks are no longer automatically required to reject any customer that deals with weed, because some of those transactions are going to be legal under the federal law. Which basically allows them to look the other way for all such transactions.