←back to thread

141 points winkywooster | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.441s | source
1. snitty ◴[] No.40217709[source]
>Rama’s language is Turing-complete…

Amazing they could accomplish such a feat.

replies(1): >>40218024 #
2. titanomachy ◴[] No.40218024[source]
This seems unnecessarily cynical, they're just stating one of the design decisions that they made. When you design a new DSL you could choose to make it Turing-complete (e.g. Ruby on Rails) or not Turing-complete (e.g. Terraform's HCL). The point isn't that one is more technically difficult to build than the other.