←back to thread

179 points farslan | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.63s | source
1. user_7832 ◴[] No.40217141[source]
As much as I will most likely never spend 6 figures on a watch, I greatly appreciate their engineering. Tangential, does anyone know how easy is it to design and build your own movement?
replies(2): >>40217207 #>>40218612 #
2. sndean ◴[] No.40217207[source]
I don't know about the difficulty, but you can look at the complexity of this ETA 6497 movement on GrabCAD [0]. After seeing this a while ago, it made sense to me why small/new brands generally use a Seiko NH35 or something similar that they can buy in bulk.

[0] https://grabcad.com/library/eta-6497-1-complete-watch-moveme...

replies(1): >>40221521 #
3. throw0101b ◴[] No.40218612[source]
> As much as I will most likely never spend 6 figures on a watch, I greatly appreciate their engineering.

How about in the US$ 9000 range? Frederique Constant Manufacture Slimline Perpetual Calendar:

* https://www.chrono24.com/frederiqueconstant/manufacture-slim...

(Perhaps as a gift to yourself for a major milestone: 50th birthday, retirement, etc.)

replies(1): >>40221456 #
4. user_7832 ◴[] No.40221456[source]
Thanks for the suggestion, certainly possible I think. Honestly it depends a lot on how my career/income turns out, but the watch looks good!
5. user_7832 ◴[] No.40221521[source]
Thanks a lot! Sounds like reverse engineering a complicated (heh) watch movement could be a fun challenge to start with!