←back to thread

235 points tosh | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.319s | source
Show context
xanderlewis ◴[] No.40214349[source]
> Stripped of anything else, neural networks are compositions of differentiable primitives

I’m a sucker for statements like this. It almost feels philosophical, and makes the whole subject so much more comprehensible in only a single sentence.

I think François Chollet says something similar in his book on deep learning: one shouldn’t fall into the trap of anthropomorphising and mysticising models based on the ‘neural’ name; deep learning is simply the application of sequences of operations that are nonlinear (and hence capable of encoding arbitrary complexity) but nonetheless differentiable and so efficiently optimisable.

replies(12): >>40214569 #>>40214829 #>>40215168 #>>40215198 #>>40215245 #>>40215592 #>>40215628 #>>40216343 #>>40216719 #>>40216975 #>>40219489 #>>40219752 #
1. sideshowb ◴[] No.40216975[source]
> deep learning is simply the application of sequences of operations that are nonlinear but nonetheless differentiable

Though other things fit this description which are not deep learning. Like (shameless plug) my recent paper here https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10497907