←back to thread

662 points JacobHenner | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.213s | source
Show context
andrewxdiamond ◴[] No.40213760[source]
Weed being illegal on a federal level has had some interesting effects. Because of these laws, all legal weed has to be grown, processed, and retailed within a single state. So much industry and local employment has been created by the legal barriers in place.

It’s probably still a net positive to release the federal restriction, but I hope all these small/mid sized businesses don’t get gulped up by big tobacco or other mega corps

replies(18): >>40213812 #>>40214163 #>>40214201 #>>40214244 #>>40214266 #>>40214279 #>>40214281 #>>40214722 #>>40214865 #>>40215132 #>>40215210 #>>40215250 #>>40215640 #>>40215792 #>>40218541 #>>40219533 #>>40222689 #>>40228530 #
joecool1029 ◴[] No.40214865[source]
> I hope all these small/mid sized businesses don’t get gulped up by big tobacco or other mega corps

Calling it: CVS and Walgreens will move into the medical market for this. You think these little shops will be able to process health insurance payments when that sector gets in on it? lol

replies(3): >>40214931 #>>40215031 #>>40217094 #
hollerith ◴[] No.40215031[source]
I bet that in the US, no health insurer will ever pay for an insured person's marijuana.
replies(3): >>40215281 #>>40216450 #>>40217806 #
1. SoftTalker ◴[] No.40216450[source]
I agree it's unlikely. THC may have some medical uses, but smoking it certainly does not.

Perhaps gummies/edibles would be covered under some circumstances -- but to be a prescription or even an OTC "medication" it has to go through FDA approval to demonstrate efficacy and document the side effects, and it will have to be manufactured to pharmaceutical standards of potency and purity, which will make it more expensive.

I think it will most likely be like alcohol: sold for recreational use, age-restricted, and not medical.