←back to thread

662 points JacobHenner | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
paxys ◴[] No.40214410[source]
On one hand I'm very happy with all the recent policy changes coming down from different federal agencies, but on the other there's a very high likelihood that they will all be reversed a few months from now if/when a new administration takes over. That is always the downside of executive rule. With Congress unwilling/incapable of acting though I guess this is the best we'll get.
replies(5): >>40214437 #>>40214495 #>>40214631 #>>40214636 #>>40215141 #
colpabar ◴[] No.40214495[source]
What bothers me is that all these things are only happening because it's an election year and the incumbent doesn't have great polling numbers.
replies(5): >>40214539 #>>40214638 #>>40215135 #>>40215913 #>>40216274 #
0x5f3759df-i ◴[] No.40215913[source]
You obviously haven’t been paying attention as these rule making processes started literally years ago that’s how much red tape there is to get through.

And even if what you are saying was true (it isn’t) isn’t that the entire argument for democracy in the first place? “Politicians make good policy because they want to get re-elected” is how we should hope things work.

replies(2): >>40216170 #>>40216421 #
1. hed ◴[] No.40216421[source]
It started in October 2022 (a month before midterms), if anything a skeptic would say that's more confirmation timing is suspect.