←back to thread

662 points JacobHenner | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.415s | source
Show context
mustafa_pasi ◴[] No.40214513[source]
Feels like they were keeping this card in their sleeves for when they needed a popularity boost.
replies(2): >>40214556 #>>40216835 #
apengwin ◴[] No.40214556[source]
It is a good thing for democratically accountable governments to do good things that the people want!
replies(4): >>40214649 #>>40214971 #>>40218655 #>>40219085 #
chucksta ◴[] No.40214971[source]
Tell that to all the people pissed off at Roe v Wade
replies(4): >>40214985 #>>40215500 #>>40216784 #>>40217770 #
krapp[dead post] ◴[] No.40214985[source]
[flagged]
1. AnimalMuppet ◴[] No.40215171[source]
OK, but at the time of Roe v. Wade, I don't think the majority of people wanted abortion legalized, either. I'm not sure the majority of people wanted gay marriage legalized (at the time).

But even more: You don't want the judges to be focused on what the majority want. That's not the rule of law.

replies(1): >>40215376 #
2. krapp ◴[] No.40215376[source]
Yes, I'm objecting to the premise that "democratically accountable governments do(ing) good things that the people want" describes the process by which Roe v. Wade was repealed. It was not democratically accountable, and it was what only a subset of the people wanted.

The Supreme Court is not an example of democracy working, it's a purposely anti-democratic institution.