←back to thread

662 points JacobHenner | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
Germanion ◴[] No.40213675[source]
Finally!

Then hopefully the f... UN can do that too.

I'm totally shocked that the UN has such a hard and shitty drug policy.

replies(3): >>40213729 #>>40213767 #>>40213943 #
spaduf ◴[] No.40213729[source]
Wasn't that a project of Reagan's?
replies(1): >>40213787 #
aaronbrethorst ◴[] No.40213787[source]
I believe the concept of drug 'scheduling' was introduced in the Controlled Substances Act under Richard Nixon: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_cannabis_laws_in_t....

Reagan had his War on Drugs, which resulted in the imprisonment of an order of magnitude more nonviolent drug offenders: https://www.britannica.com/topic/war-on-drugs

replies(1): >>40213934 #
skhunted ◴[] No.40213934[source]
There was a debate in the early 80s on whether the country should concentrate on treatment or enforcement. Reagan introduced zero tolerance policies. He usually chose the wrong approach.
replies(1): >>40214002 #
Alupis ◴[] No.40214002[source]
> Reagan introduced zero tolerance policies. He usually chose the wrong approach

That doesn't seem to clear cut with the recent failed (and now backpedaling) experiments regarding decriminalization and legalization of most drugs.

replies(4): >>40214041 #>>40214114 #>>40214193 #>>40214222 #
asveikau ◴[] No.40214041[source]
It's more like the stuff that doesn't work is being pushed again.
replies(1): >>40214062 #
Alupis ◴[] No.40214062[source]
On it's surface it seems to have worked better than these experiments. Otherwise the experiments would not be getting rolled back...

There's very few if any fans of what played out in Portland, for instance. Overt drug usage exploded and became a much worse problem. The exact opposite of what proponents had hoped.

Some will say "but they didn't do it right" or similar - tired arguments we hear every time pet policies fail.

replies(2): >>40214251 #>>40215024 #
1. asveikau ◴[] No.40215024[source]
You strike me as the type of person who doesn't know that US urban crime decreased in 2023.

The novel thing in world of illicit drugs is that fentanyl is very hard to dose correctly, so death rates are higher than before. That new fact on the scene makes long term comparisons difficult. But, I would say given the dropping crime rates of the last 40 years, we're doing better than the previous waves of "tough on crime" policy including drug wars from the 1980s and 1990s, despite incarcerating a lot fewer people. So I think these "experiments" absolutely are working. That effectiveness may however be overshadowed by the specific dangerousness of fentanyl in the illicit market.