←back to thread

179 points farslan | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.856s | source | bottom
1. mmcgaha ◴[] No.40214996[source]
My eyes are so bad now that I would rather have a no date. Strangely the no-date watches tend to be out of my price range.
replies(4): >>40215201 #>>40216260 #>>40217386 #>>40218635 #
2. aidenn0 ◴[] No.40215201[source]
The Seiko Essentials series has several watches without complications; some have a street price of under $200.
replies(1): >>40215933 #
3. buescher ◴[] No.40215933[source]
Some even omit the second hand which is the most technically correct version of "without complications". Also the most traditional/formal for a men's dress watch or women's watch.
4. jddj ◴[] No.40216260[source]
For an automatic with no date, the bulova hack is quite nice if the vintage field look works for you.

The one I had was great for the price, probably the most accurate automatic I ever owned but that could well be luck.

5. al_borland ◴[] No.40217386[source]
There is also an issue where some cheap no-date watches use a complication with a date, and just don’t cut out the dial to show it. I try to watch out for this whenever I’m looking for a watch.
6. throw0101b ◴[] No.40218635[source]
> My eyes are so bad now that I would rather have a no date. Strangely the no-date watches tend to be out of my price range.

Have a look at Fleiger-style ("pilot watches") watches:

* https://timeandtidewatches.com/best-flieger-watches/

* https://www.gearpatrol.com/watches/a97397/flieger-watches/

* https://teddybaldassarre.com/blogs/watches/flieger-watches

Models available ranging from US$150 to $15000.