←back to thread

662 points JacobHenner | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.294s | source
Show context
RyanAdamas ◴[] No.40214560[source]
Utter bullshit. Reclassifying schedule 1 Drugs requires the approval of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs of the UN. Otherwise, they are just reclassifying it under an already reclassified treaty structure as a red herring.

The Psychotropic Substances Act modified the existing schedule, but left other acts in tact - those other acts are the ones being modified by this nonsense circus.

replies(3): >>40214665 #>>40214678 #>>40214825 #
sanderjd ◴[] No.40214678[source]
I'm quite ignorant about how international law and treaties interact with domestic policy. Could you educate me? What is the mechanism within US law by which this reclassification requires approval by that UN commission?
replies(1): >>40214775 #
RyanAdamas ◴[] No.40214775[source]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychotropic_Substances_Act_(U... The above link is the Act that governs the USA's international obligations based on our treaty with the UN to schedule specific drugs and under those terms only allowed to reschedule Schedule 1 drugs with the approval of the UN; often after a review of the drugs medicinal purposes by the WHO.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comprehensive_Drug_Abuse_Preve... The above is a "DEA" schedule of drug classifications that the government can play around with and bullshit us on. Many of Cannabis schedules have already been reduced based on specific compounds of THC under other treaties enacted before the 1978 alignment from above. These domestic rescheduling may have an affect on legal charges or banking, but cannot address the overarching classifier of Schedule 1 drugs which is the UN based on the 1st link.

replies(3): >>40214855 #>>40214979 #>>40215357 #
1. sanderjd ◴[] No.40214855[source]
Thank you for the links!

I'm hoping other knowledgeable people will also weigh in on this topic.