←back to thread

662 points JacobHenner | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.769s | source
1. xp84 ◴[] No.40214740[source]
From the article: "Then there’s the United States’ international treaty obligations, chief among them the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, which requires the criminalization of cannabis."

Ah, I see. Somehow I doubt that if the US announced it would withdraw from this treaty, to be replaced by an amended version, we'd be invaded immediately by all our (former) allies and be driven straight into the sea. Like, I'm sure there are governments even more obsessed with cannabis than we've been, but like, they'll have to get over it sometime.

replies(1): >>40215082 #
2. jjcm ◴[] No.40215082[source]
Canada got told "shame on you" when they legalized. That seems to be about the extent of the ramifications: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Narcotics_Contro...
replies(2): >>40215211 #>>40220480 #
3. lukeinator42 ◴[] No.40215211[source]
I was curious if us Canadians were on that treaty, haha.
4. cmrdporcupine ◴[] No.40220480[source]
Yeah the irony here is that it's been the US making the most trouble on this topic. Border agents were pretty difficult for a while, and in theory they can still ban you for life for admitting you have consumed it here, even though it's legal.

I don't consume it really, but if I did I'd never pay for it online with a CC processor or anything that goes through an American data centre. The US is way too crazy about this stuff, and an overzealous border control agent armed with information he shouldn't have can ruin your whole day/week/life.