←back to thread

380 points rezonant | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
anileated ◴[] No.40208302[source]
Do I think side-loading and alt app stores would make iPads and iPhones more versatile devices? Yes.

Do I believe indie devs will be worse off? Unfortunately, also yes.

If you are a solo app developer, you will now have to keep presence on all app stores out there, since if you don’t publish on one then a copycat will. Every store would have its own review processes, fee structures, billing and tax procedures. Since you would need to follow a dozen of those, as an indie operation realistically you will either go under or pay middleman companies a chunk for this—so, in the end, you’ll lose the same cut or more and we’re back to the starting point.

Furthermore, I believe you will have much less protection against plain piracy, which was a big thing in the days of yore until it was spectacularly dealt with by Apple within its mobile ecosystem.

This is why I suspect the primary interests side-loading and alt app stores on Apple devices would satisfy is large enterprises and a few opportunistic middlemen. Entities like Epic, Netflix, who will be able to generate more profit; governments, perhaps; a few publishing companies (think CDBaby for apps) will win small time; some users who don’t want to pay and want to get things for free might be able to get their way; indie devs will be worse off.

replies(16): >>40208353 #>>40208448 #>>40208458 #>>40208518 #>>40208520 #>>40208529 #>>40208559 #>>40208626 #>>40208630 #>>40208693 #>>40208746 #>>40208979 #>>40209032 #>>40210376 #>>40210772 #>>40220048 #
mrighele ◴[] No.40208518[source]
I disagree. First of all I expect competing stores to ask a smaller cut than what currently Apple asks (and Apple itself may lower it), so it may very well be the case even with a middleman the amount "lost" by the developer will be lower. Not a given though, I guess we will see.

Secondly, the Android ecosystem seems to be doing well even with the situation you describe. There are not that many competing stores (mostly from sellers of devices, like huawei, samsung, amazon, which is something will not happen with Apple devices), and piracy, while present is not as commons as with desktops.

replies(2): >>40208703 #>>40209817 #
outofpaper ◴[] No.40208703[source]
I agree with you on most counts save for the piracy. It's highly dependent on market segment, with less affluent sectors especially with youth you'll find very high privacy rates.

I look forward to the day an fdroid like platform is available on Apple phones and tablets.

replies(2): >>40208753 #>>40210080 #
1. saintfire ◴[] No.40210080{3}[source]
I'd contend that profiteering off of youth is more questionably moral than piracy among youth.

I pirated virtually everything I consumed as a kid/teen and now that I have money I pay for it. The companies I pirated off of lost nothing because I had no means to purchase it anyways.