←back to thread

380 points rezonant | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
1. dzogchen ◴[] No.40208912[source]
Sideloading is such a horrible term for “installing apps without Apple’s approval”. And Apple illegally even tries to STILL require their approval.
replies(1): >>40209025 #
2. FooBarWidget ◴[] No.40209025[source]
I agree. I have no idea when "sideloading" as a term became a thing when it's just plain old "installing software".
replies(2): >>40209771 #>>40209791 #
3. wccrawford ◴[] No.40209771[source]
I think it's because dystopian situations force people to name things oddly.

And yes, I think not being able to put an app on a device that I paid for is dystopian. I also think not being allowed to repair my own devices is dystopian, too.

If no device had ever prevented a user from installing their own home-made apps, "side-loading" would never have become a thing.

For gaming consoles, I was vaguely uneased by it at first, but quickly got over it because it had always been that way. I never had a chance to put my own game on a game console.

But with general-use computers, including mobile phones, the whole idea really bothers me. I PDAs and brick phones had never allowed people to write their own apps, I might be less bothered by it. But (thankfully!) they did. That cat's out of the bag, and long ago.

Even Google's attempts to prevent "sideloading" bother me at this point. Any warning that applies to side-loaded apps should also apply to store-installed apps because they have shown they aren't foolproof.

4. marak830 ◴[] No.40209791[source]
I would argue the same reason "quiet quitting" has become more of a norm. Corporate interests that are pushed to various media that becomes 'standard'.