←back to thread

380 points rezonant | 5 comments | | HN request time: 1.505s | source
1. Longhanks ◴[] No.40208695[source]
With these legislations, I always wonder how the lawmakers come up with timeframes like 6 months. Who is to say this implementation doesn't take, say, a year? I doubt lawmakers have the technological know how to estimate such a project (actually, I doubt anyone has) - but 6 months seems rather short (given they hadn't just had to implement the same thing for iOS)...?
replies(2): >>40208783 #>>40210301 #
2. rsynnott ◴[] No.40208783[source]
> given they hadn't just had to implement the same thing for iOS

You've kind of answered this for yourself; iPadOS _is_ iOS.

Apple has, in any case, presumably more or less known this was coming for a year or so; they kind of had to make the argument that iPadOS and iOS were not the same thing, I suppose, but it was always a bit far-fetched that the EC would buy that.

replies(1): >>40209093 #
3. ghusto ◴[] No.40209093[source]
It was actually due to the way "gatekeeper" is defined. The EU has now said that although iPads (still) do not meet the criteria, they are being explicitly targeted anyway. My guess is because this is simpler than expanding the criteria to include iPads in some way.
replies(1): >>40209939 #
4. Kbelicius ◴[] No.40209939{3}[source]
> My guess is because this is simpler than expanding the criteria to include iPads in some way.

They don't need to expand the criteria. DMA empowers the commission to investigate, and even declare as gatekeepers, products that do not meet the quantitative thresholds on the basis of qualitative assessment.

EU Commissioner Thierry Breton said: “We continue monitoring market developments and will not hesitate to open new investigations should other services below the thresholds present characteristics to be considered important gateways for business users,”. per the commission iPad passes the threshold for business users elevenfold.

5. troupo ◴[] No.40210301[source]
Any deadline will be declared either too short or too long.

That's why the deadlines usually tend to be on the shorter side to put actual pressure on companies needing to implement them. However, the companies always have a way to say "look, we've tried our best, it's just we just need more time". No one is going to fine them for not meeting those deadlines if the companies are actually working on implementing the changes in good faith.