> "- Companies that profit from murder."
Holy conspiracy theory batman
> "- Companies that profit billions by charging poor people more money."
Would you prefer that companies that serve poor people stop doing so? Because that would only raise prices for products poor people use. Supply and demand - it's the only sure thing in economics.
> "- Companies that profit by (essentially) extorted thousands of dollars from people with the only other option being death."
The companies created an alternative option to literally dying, and you call this extortion? Would you prefer they not offer this option at all?
> "- A person who profits by underpaying labor and creating false supply/demand."
Underpayment is only possible in some dreamworld. If workers are being underpaid, then by definition they can get better pay by switching jobs. Why aren't they? And if they can't get better pay, then they aren't being underpaid - they're being paid market rates.
> "And get this bud, they don't care about you either! If Northrop Grumann could make $10,000,000 by turning you into a fine red mist they'd push that button before the ink on the check was dry."
The basics of survival are provided by greedy, psychopathic, for-profit cybernetic organisms called corporations.
And life has never been better, especially for the very poorest.
I would suggest that you look at some hard data in this regard, rather than defining your own parallel economic reality in which you can be so very satisfied in your anger.
If you want a hug, Northrop Grumman or your landlord or big pharma just don't do cuddly. Get a dog or a friend. If you want results that are measurable as housing provided, years of life added, or fighter jets built, or tons of wheat produced, then get a corporation.