←back to thread

275 points swores | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
hi-v-rocknroll ◴[] No.40173019[source]
Semaglutide retails for $17k USD/year in the US but costs only $60 to make. Perhaps it could be argued that the autoinjectors are "expensive", but not $17k/year and oral forms are coming online to make this item moot. In limited circumstances, excessive profits cross into the realm of price gouging and shouldn't be allowed by regulatory enforcement.
replies(9): >>40173117 #>>40173204 #>>40173218 #>>40173309 #>>40173371 #>>40173374 #>>40173583 #>>40173707 #>>40174265 #
pfdietz ◴[] No.40173117[source]
The cost of manufacturing the drug is only relevant if the drug can be discovered and proved effective by the Magic Drug Fairy.

Here in the real world, that manufacturing cost is largely irrelevant.

replies(4): >>40173280 #>>40173459 #>>40173643 #>>40174064 #
1. narrator ◴[] No.40173280[source]
This reminds me of P=NP. It's hard to find a sha256 with a given number of leading zeros, but it's super easy to verify. It's hard to make Microsoft Office, or a Pharmaceutical Drug, but easy to see that they work. The confusion is at the root of most economic fallacies.