(www.vors.stargrave.org)

86 points stargrave | 4 comments | 19 Apr 24 05:16 UTC | HN request time: 0.857s | source

1. uyzstvqs ◴[19 Apr 24 09:56 UTC] No.40084906[source]▶

> users tend to complain about [Mumble's] newer client versions quality and convenience.

I have never heard anyone complain about Mumble's UX. Especially not that it has gotten worse. Or it's resource usage, which is practically unnoticeable on any average system sold past 2005. It's the best-in-class and has only gotten better.

replies(1): >>40086623 #

2. thfuran ◴[19 Apr 24 13:32 UTC] No.40086623[source]▶

>>40084906 (TP) #

And even if I had, I'm quite sure they wouldn't have meant they wanted it in the terminal instead.

replies(1): >>40088742 #

3. tarxvf ◴[19 Apr 24 16:24 UTC] No.40088742[source]▶

>>40086623 #

Well cover me in foil and charge extra, I guess I'm rare.

Why would I ever want a GUI for a voice application?

replies(1): >>40101081 #

4. thfuran ◴[20 Apr 24 21:15 UTC] No.40101081{3}[source]▶

>>40088742 #

You are aware that nearly all computer users never use the terminal at all, right? Why would they want anything other than a gui?

↑

VoRS: Vo(IP) Simple Alternative to Mumble