←back to thread

551 points adrianhon | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.209s | source
Show context
laurex ◴[] No.39972922[source]
It’s not just that she overcame odds as a woman in the tech business that amazes, but that she was so clearly someone who cared about people, and chose to risk her business and reputation more than once to stay true to her values. That’s perhaps even more rare in this industry than being a successful female CEO.
replies(2): >>39973061 #>>39973092 #
ThomPete ◴[] No.39973092[source]
there are no odds as a woman in the tech business. The tech industry is on of the most inclusive industries because it measures talent and value creation not features no one can do anything about
replies(6): >>39973162 #>>39973199 #>>39975359 #>>39977240 #>>39977589 #>>39981160 #
worik ◴[] No.39973162[source]
> tech industry is on of the most inclusive industries because it...

Where have you been?

That ignoring history

replies(1): >>39973825 #
DontchaKnowit[dead post] ◴[] No.39973825[source]
[flagged]
worik ◴[] No.39974780[source]
> Every tech company on the planet is tripping over themselves to hire/promote more minorities

That is because of the problems than have been mounting in tech because people only hired people that looked like them.

I do not understand what the problem is with DEI. (I am not in the USA, perhaps I am missing out). Making sure that no one is left behind, because they were over looked, seems like a good thing to me.

replies(5): >>39975113 #>>39975166 #>>39975457 #>>39979597 #>>39979945 #
1. Chris2048 ◴[] No.39979597[source]
> Making sure that no one is left behind, because they were over looked, seems like a good thing to me.

This sound a lot like the "just asking questions", esp because of the "seems like a good thing to me" bit, like you know it's a mischaracterisation of the problem.

If you really don't understand, read what people write.

If all you believe DEI is what you characterised as above, then you aren't reading any dissenting opinion.