←back to thread

The Rise and Fall of Silicon Graphics

(www.abortretry.fail)
346 points BirAdam | 1 comments | 05 Apr 24 16:42 UTC | HN request time: 0.287s | source
Show context
martinpw ◴[05 Apr 24 18:13 UTC] No.39945361[source]▶
Whenever this topic comes up there are always comments saying that SGI was taken by surprise by cheap hardware and if only they had seen it coming they could have prepared for it and managed it.

I was there around 97 (?) and remember everyone in the company being asked to read the book "The Innovator's Dilemma", which described exactly this situation - a high end company being overtaken by worse but cheaper competitors that improved year by year until they take the entire market. The point being that the company was extremely aware of what was happening. It was not taken by surprise. But in spite of that, it was still unable to respond.

replies(24): >>39945445 #>>39945479 #>>39945482 #>>39945689 #>>39945716 #>>39945753 #>>39946158 #>>39946264 #>>39946444 #>>39947143 #>>39947437 #>>39947638 #>>39947930 #>>39948579 #>>39948653 #>>39948877 #>>39948901 #>>39949363 #>>39949453 #>>39950393 #>>39950670 #>>39950973 #>>39951304 #>>39970462 #
bombcar ◴[05 Apr 24 23:50 UTC] No.39948653[source]▶
The way to survive is to eat your own lunch. Be the low cost competitor and cannabilize your own market.

Otherwise you don’t build the iPhone because you don’t want to lose iPod sales.

replies(2): >>39950704 #>>39957916 #
1. musicale ◴[07 Apr 24 03:21 UTC] No.39957916[source]▶
> Be the low cost competitor and cannabilize your own market. Otherwise you don’t build the iPhone because you don’t want to lose iPod sales.

The iPhone was a high-cost competitor to the iPod. And Apple knew that multi-function devices usually offered poorer user experiences than more focused, (mostly) single-function devices like the iPod. But they still did the iPhone.