←back to thread

IrfanView

(www.irfanview.com)
520 points omnibrain | 8 comments | | HN request time: 4.068s | source | bottom
Show context
instagraham ◴[] No.39876705[source]
Why are most comments referring to having used this in the past tense? I was under the impression that it was still the best image viewer in town, on Windows at least
replies(15): >>39876768 #>>39876791 #>>39876805 #>>39876840 #>>39876941 #>>39876948 #>>39876972 #>>39877073 #>>39877116 #>>39877295 #>>39877296 #>>39877319 #>>39877579 #>>39878017 #>>39878986 #
AlienRobot ◴[] No.39877295[source]
I prefer JPEGView on Windows. What do you think is the best alternative for Linux?
replies(2): >>39877526 #>>39882190 #
1. Semaphor ◴[] No.39877526[source]
Just saw this mentioned above, might as well ask here: why? It looks to only support a small fraction of features.
replies(2): >>39878881 #>>39880137 #
2. netol ◴[] No.39878881[source]
It's faster to load images
3. AlienRobot ◴[] No.39880137[source]
It opens instantly. It shows just the image by default (no toolbars, scroll bars, menu bars, or status bars). I can disable linear interpolation with F3 and show width/height of an image with F2. It zooms with the scroll wheel, pans by dragging, and it lets me go to the next, previous, first, and last image of a directory instantly, and doing that won't resize the window.

I suppose the key difference is that some people want just a read-only image viewer that traverses a directory, while others want a photo viewer, or image metadata editor, or photo management system. I haven't used Windows' default image viewer in ages, but I recall when I used it, rotating an image actually rotated the image, as in it changed the orientation header of JPEG files and rewrote the files. This is why I have trust issues. If even image viewers can't just view the image, how can I possibly trust the software that drives cars, flies planes, or does the banking?

replies(1): >>39882437 #
4. Semaphor ◴[] No.39882437[source]
> I suppose the key difference is

Not really the difference in context of IrfanView which is also just an image viewer.

I tried JpegView, but it’s lacking several features I use in IV, and stuff I commonly do in IV is harder to do, so for me IV is a clear and easy winner. Performance is a little better, but not in a way I’d actually care about (mainly superfast skipping through images is slightly faster)

replies(1): >>39886833 #
5. AlienRobot ◴[] No.39886833{3}[source]
Could you tell me which features do you use in IrfanView that JpegView lacks?
replies(1): >>39891704 #
6. Semaphor ◴[] No.39891704{4}[source]
Just from memory as I uninstalled it already:

* Settings in one place, that way I could have probably easily found out how to remove the annoying zoom-features.

* Batch conversion

* Slideshow: Add files/folders, not just a textfile or folder

* Slideshow: More options in general, e.g. random or unique random.

replies(1): >>39896953 #
7. AlienRobot ◴[] No.39896953{5}[source]
Thanks. I never use the slideshow features so I guess I didn't notice.

I do think it's odd to expect an image viewer to be able to do batch conversion, though. That's what I meant by a read-only image viewer.

replies(1): >>39898277 #
8. Semaphor ◴[] No.39898277{6}[source]
It does support batch rename, though. And generally I want to resize images while looking at them, and not go elsewhere for that. But only when I want it to, no automation.