←back to thread

1071 points mtlynch | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.423s | source
Show context
tgtweak ◴[] No.39399561[source]
I think people (and the founder) are focusing on yearly profits as their remuneration and comparing it to a salary... but the reality is you're creating a company that should be valued (and eventually sell) for 7-15X Earnings - and you really should be looking at that increase in value vs your increase in profits. In reality your net worth went up by over $1.5 million in the last year, in addition to earning 236k - that is the actual value you created for yourself in the last year and not the 236k you cashflowed.

I find it redeeming that despite having a gift for development - software and hardware - the biggest factors affecting profitability and growth here are things that most MBAs would do in a business quite regularly (outsourcing design/packaging/fulfillment, streamlining costs, doing price elasticity experiments, polling customers and markets for product improvement).

I enjoyed seeing the inverted perspective that product/engineering is straightforward and low risk but things like optimizing fulfillment and operating costs is a new exciting endeavor.

One tip I suggest doing is leveraging google ads to figure out features that customers are willing to pay for before you build them... if they're clicking the ad they are searching for it and interested in buying it. Start a few very low cap campaigns calling out features you are thinking of building into the product, and see which one get's the most impressions and clicks per marketing dollar and focus on that. The added advantage is you know it will be easier to buy advertising for it once the feature is done.

replies(19): >>39399620 #>>39399792 #>>39399807 #>>39399841 #>>39400048 #>>39400566 #>>39401046 #>>39401539 #>>39402096 #>>39402281 #>>39402808 #>>39403151 #>>39403976 #>>39404585 #>>39404635 #>>39405281 #>>39405525 #>>39405560 #>>39407147 #
bad_good_guy ◴[] No.39400048[source]
Why should a company be assumed to be eventually sold? What the heck is that kind of perspective. The vast majority of small/medium companies are not sold - instead they provide regular income to their owners.

This sounds to me like typical toxic silicon valley startup mindset.

replies(7): >>39400153 #>>39400377 #>>39400478 #>>39400598 #>>39400604 #>>39400843 #>>39400966 #
robertlagrant ◴[] No.39400153[source]
> This sounds to me like typical toxic silicon valley startup mindset.

I think this is naive cynicism, as it were. Lots of companies are started by people who eventually want to sell them, be it after 5 years or 50. Being biased against Silicon Valley won't give you a good handle on this stuff.

replies(4): >>39400759 #>>39400765 #>>39400766 #>>39400909 #
PH95VuimJjqBqy ◴[] No.39400909[source]
then do the calculations in 5 or 50 years.
replies(1): >>39401110 #
robertlagrant ◴[] No.39401110[source]
I don't understand your mindset that says you should decide when other people multiply some numbers.
replies(1): >>39401315 #
1. PH95VuimJjqBqy ◴[] No.39401315[source]
I don't understand how anyone misread that so badly while genuinely attempting to respond.

I suppose we can both say there are things we don't understand.

replies(1): >>39410430 #
2. robertlagrant ◴[] No.39410430[source]
> I don't understand how anyone misread that so badly while genuinely attempting to respond.

Probably because when given a chance, you don't take the chance to explain yourself better, and just do a junior high Uno reverse card response.