←back to thread

YC: Requests for Startups

(www.ycombinator.com)
514 points sarimkx | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Animats ◴[] No.39374469[source]
Most of those take a lot more time and money than YC usually offers.

There are some opportunities in "New Defense Technology". Something like a low-cost replacement for the Javelin anti-tank missile based on off the shelf phone camera parts ought to be possible. Of course, once that's out there, every insurgent group will have some.

"Explainable AI" is really important.

"Stablecoin finance" is mostly how to make sure the issuers don't steal the collateral. Maybe the people behind the stablecoin have an explosive collar welded around their neck. If the price drops, it detonates. That might work.

"Applying machine learning to robotics" has potential. Get bin-picking nailed and get acquired by Amazon. Many people have failed at this, but it might be possible now.

"Bring manufacturing back to America". Is it possible to build a cell phone in the US?

"Climate tech" - think automating HVAC and insulation selection, installation, and analysis. Installers suck at this. See previous HVAC article on HN. A phone app where you walk around and through the building with an IR camera is one place to start. Map the duct system. Take manometer readings. Crunch. That's do-able on YC-sized money.

replies(11): >>39374714 #>>39374756 #>>39374782 #>>39374844 #>>39374851 #>>39375176 #>>39375267 #>>39375678 #>>39376994 #>>39377509 #>>39380430 #
MangoCoffee ◴[] No.39375678[source]
Low cost swarm of drones for new defense technology.

We have seen consumer grade DJI drone use in Ukraine-Russia war by both sides.

AI to control a swarm of cheap drones to survey and kill?

replies(2): >>39377635 #>>39382164 #
paledot ◴[] No.39382164[source]
Is this a serious suggestion, or a warning for why there's no place for move-fast-and-kill-things startups in the defense space? No one should be working on this, especially not involving AI in any way.
replies(2): >>39388103 #>>39394271 #
HeyLaughingBoy ◴[] No.39388103[source]
> No one should be working on this

Well, given the fact that people are working on it, and many of them probably don't like you so much, it's a good idea for "the people you call friendly" to work on it.

replies(1): >>39391952 #
1. paledot ◴[] No.39391952[source]
"Our doomsday scheme cost us just a small fraction of what we'd been spending on defense in a single year. But the deciding factor was when we learned that your country was working along similar lines, and we were afraid of a doomsday gap."