←back to thread

YC: Requests for Startups

(www.ycombinator.com)
514 points sarimkx | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
CalChris ◴[] No.39376282[source]
ELIMINATING MIDDLEMEN IN HEALTHCARE

by creating another middleman in healthcare. This was first proposed by Jim Clark's Healtheon. "We want to empower the doctors and the patients and get all the other assholes out of the way." … "Except for us. One asshole in the middle." — The New New Thing, Michael Lewis.

The reason we spend so much is that public healthcare is a public good and private companies aren't good at managing public goods. They're good at making money which is a different purpose (which has probably served most people reading this very well). We need Single Payer. Indeed we have Single Payer in Medicare and TriCare and other areas. It works pretty well. We need to eliminate middlemen in healthcare by actually eliminating rent seeking middlemen in healthcare.

replies(5): >>39377015 #>>39379568 #>>39381103 #>>39382435 #>>39383359 #
yaacov ◴[] No.39379568[source]
Healthcare is not a public good. It is both excludable and rivalrous. In fact, it is the exact opposite of a public good.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_good_(economics)

replies(1): >>39379740 #
CalChris ◴[] No.39379740[source]
Single Payer would go a long way towards making our healthcare system non-excludable and non-rivalrous. What we have, the MIDDLEMEN which the post complains about, are rent seekers.
replies(2): >>39380391 #>>39380408 #
yaacov ◴[] No.39380408[source]
No it wouldn’t. That makes no sense. You have no idea what “excludable” and “rivalrous” mean. Please read a few Wikipedia articles.
replies(2): >>39382889 #>>39383655 #
hef19898 ◴[] No.39383655[source]
Maybe you can rephrase in a way us peasants understand your point as well without a dictionary?
replies(3): >>39386822 #>>39441086 #>>39441099 #
1. cooljoseph ◴[] No.39386822[source]
Excludable = you can exclude people from benefiting from it. (E.g., Fixing global warming is not excludable while temperature control in your own house is.)

Rivalrous = more people getting it leads to less for others. (E.g., Software is not rivalrous, but hardware is.)

replies(1): >>39393902 #
2. hef19898 ◴[] No.39393902[source]
I wanted a rephrased statement, not a dictionary extract. Because I still have no clue what your piont is.