←back to thread

YC: Requests for Startups

(www.ycombinator.com)
514 points sarimkx | 9 comments | 14 Feb 24 16:31 UTC | HN request time: 0.395s | source | bottom
Show context
Animats ◴[14 Feb 24 19:59 UTC] No.39374469[source]▶
Most of those take a lot more time and money than YC usually offers.

There are some opportunities in "New Defense Technology". Something like a low-cost replacement for the Javelin anti-tank missile based on off the shelf phone camera parts ought to be possible. Of course, once that's out there, every insurgent group will have some.

"Explainable AI" is really important.

"Stablecoin finance" is mostly how to make sure the issuers don't steal the collateral. Maybe the people behind the stablecoin have an explosive collar welded around their neck. If the price drops, it detonates. That might work.

"Applying machine learning to robotics" has potential. Get bin-picking nailed and get acquired by Amazon. Many people have failed at this, but it might be possible now.

"Bring manufacturing back to America". Is it possible to build a cell phone in the US?

"Climate tech" - think automating HVAC and insulation selection, installation, and analysis. Installers suck at this. See previous HVAC article on HN. A phone app where you walk around and through the building with an IR camera is one place to start. Map the duct system. Take manometer readings. Crunch. That's do-able on YC-sized money.

replies(11): >>39374714 #>>39374756 #>>39374782 #>>39374844 #>>39374851 #>>39375176 #>>39375267 #>>39375678 #>>39376994 #>>39377509 #>>39380430 #
1. jaredmclaughlin ◴[14 Feb 24 21:01 UTC] No.39375267[source]▶
What part of a cell phone do you think we can't make?
replies(3): >>39375501 #>>39378644 #>>39379778 #
2. groby_b ◴[14 Feb 24 21:16 UTC] No.39375501[source]▶
Do we have the aluminum milling capacity at scale?

Can we manufacture touch screens at scale?

Can we manufacture Li-ion batteries at scale? (Tesla and Panasonic might be able to, with large new investments, but I don't think there's anybody ready to go)

Do we have 3nm fab capacity? (TSMC is planning to build one, but AFAIK not yet)

Do we have the ability to manufacture various sensors at scale? (Some likely yes - ambient light, inertial - some no)

What about image sensors? (Maybe, Omnivision is probably the best candidate, but I don't think they can currently do 48MP. ON Semiconductor is also a good chunk away from that, AFAIK)

I think that's a sufficient number of parts to claim we currently can't make cell phones, as long as you define cell phone as "current gen cell phone". We could probably retool relatively quickly back to at least cell phones, but even that is AFAIK not a current capacity.

Can we _theoretically_ do all that? Sure. But we can't right now, or within short time frames, and we can't without significant investment.

replies(1): >>39376321 #
3. quartesixte ◴[14 Feb 24 22:13 UTC] No.39376321[source]▶
That aluminum milling scaling problem itself is like, an entire category of hard.

CNC machines are hard to scale anything more than linearly. We need to train up hundreds of thousands to become CNC machinists. An entire support industry for machine maintenance, tooling manufacturing (an even harder problem), consumable commodities needs to be similarly scaled in parallel.

replies(1): >>39376756 #
4. hobofan ◴[14 Feb 24 22:57 UTC] No.39376756{3}[source]▶
> We need to train up hundreds of thousands to become CNC machinists

What? Are you suggesting that aluminium phone cases nowadays are created by an army of trained CNC machinists? And not programmed once by a (few) dozen engineers per model of the handful of existing phone models and then executed by highly automated factories and an army of "low-skilled" workers.

replies(2): >>39377371 #>>39404912 #
5. 9cb14c1ec0 ◴[15 Feb 24 00:06 UTC] No.39377371{4}[source]▶
Completely automated machining cells have been a thing for a long time.
replies(1): >>39378912 #
6. catlifeonmars ◴[15 Feb 24 03:07 UTC] No.39378644[source]▶
Modems :D
7. mlhpdx ◴[15 Feb 24 03:52 UTC] No.39378912{5}[source]▶
True, but hiring CNC programmers is a significant limiting factor in growing such businesses.
8. yjftsjthsd-h ◴[15 Feb 24 06:35 UTC] No.39379778[source]▶
The chips. Which are... kind of the most important part, arguably. Hopefully Intel's new fabs will help.
9. quartesixte ◴[17 Feb 24 00:29 UTC] No.39404912{4}[source]▶
That army of “low-skilled” workers are highly skilled machine operators.

CNC programming isn’t generally performed by engineers—it is currently mostly performed by veteran machine operators.

To get enough veteran machine operators who have the skill and talent to program at the level necessary for high-precision consumer goods, you need quite the workforce pool.

And then add in all the other CNC machinists and manufacturing engineers you need for the auxiliary industries (tooling, molding, the machines themselves) and it starts to add up.

Don’t forget every other industry that is competing for this labor pool.