←back to thread

1045 points mfiguiere | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.232s | source
Show context
AndrewKemendo ◴[] No.39345391[source]
ROCm is not spelled out anywhere in their documentation and the best answers in search come from Github and not AMD official documents

"Radeon Open Compute Platform"

https://github.com/ROCm/ROCm/issues/1628

And they wonder why they are losing. Branding absolutely matters.

replies(8): >>39345468 #>>39345472 #>>39345491 #>>39345516 #>>39345873 #>>39345947 #>>39345989 #>>39352446 #
1. Farfignoggen ◴[] No.39352446[source]
Lisa Su in a later presentation/event announced that ROCM is no longer an acronym! So Radeon Open CoMpute is no longer the definition there! But ROCm/HIP and CUDA/CUDA Tools, and OneAPI/Level-0 are essentially the same coverage/scope for AMD, Nvidia, Intel respectively as far as GPU Compute API support goes and HPC/Accelerator workloads as well.

So there's a YouTube Video from some Supercomputer conference where the presenter goes over the support Matrix info for ROCm/HIP, CUDA/CUDA Tools, and OneAPI/Level-0 and they are similar in scope there.