←back to thread

1045 points mfiguiere | 7 comments | | HN request time: 0.722s | source | bottom
Show context
lambdaone ◴[] No.39345937[source]
It seems to me that AMD are crazy to stop funding this. CUDA-on-ROCm breaks NVIDIA's moat, and would also act as a disincentive for NVIDIA to make breaking changes to CUDA; what more could AMD want?

When you're #1, you can go all-in on your own proprietary stack, knowing that network effects will drive your market share higher and higher for you for free.

When you're #2, you need to follow de-facto standards and work on creating and following truly open ones, and try to compete on actual value, rather than rent-seeking. AMD of all companies should know this.

replies(3): >>39346130 #>>39346284 #>>39351222 #
1. RamRodification ◴[] No.39346130[source]
> and would also act as a disincentive for NVIDIA to make breaking changes to CUDA

I don't know about that. You could kinda argue the opposite. "We improved CUDA. Oh it stopped working for you on AMD hardware? Too bad. Buy Nvidia next time"

replies(4): >>39346591 #>>39346820 #>>39346957 #>>39348275 #
2. mnau ◴[] No.39346591[source]
Also known as OS/2: Redux strategy.
3. freeone3000 ◴[] No.39346820[source]
Most CUDA applications do not target the newest CUDA version! Despite 12.1 being out, lots of code still targets 7 or 8 to support old NVIDIA cards. Similar support for AMD isn’t unthinkable (but a rewrite to rocm would be).
replies(1): >>39351779 #
4. ◴[] No.39346957[source]
5. outside415 ◴[] No.39348275[source]
NVIDIA is about ecosystem plays, they have no interest in sabotage or anti competition plays. Leave that to apple and google and their dumb app stores and mobile OSs.
replies(1): >>39348669 #
6. 0x457 ◴[] No.39348669[source]
> NVIDIA is about ecosystem plays, they have no interest in sabotage or anti competition plays.

Are we talking about the same NVIDIA? The entire Nvidia GPU strategy for nvidia is - make a feature (or find existing one) that performs better on their cards - pay developers to use (and sometimes misuse) it extensively.

7. lambdaone ◴[] No.39351779[source]
That's exactly the point I was making above.