←back to thread

1045 points mfiguiere | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.258s | source
Show context
btown ◴[] No.39345221[source]
Why would this not be AMD’s top priority among priorities? Someone recently likened the situation to an Iron Age where NVIDIA owns all the iron. And this sounds like AMD knowing about a new source of ore and not even being willing to sink a single engineer’s salary into exploration.

My only guess is they have a parallel skunkworks working on the same thing, but in a way that they can keep it closed-source - that this was a hedge they think they no longer need, and they are missing the forest for the trees on the benefits of cross-pollination and open source ethos to their business.

replies(14): >>39345241 #>>39345302 #>>39345393 #>>39345400 #>>39345458 #>>39345853 #>>39345857 #>>39345893 #>>39346210 #>>39346792 #>>39346857 #>>39347433 #>>39347900 #>>39347927 #
iforgotpassword ◴[] No.39345302[source]
Someone built the same a while ago for Intel gpus, I think even still the old pre-Xe ones. With arc/xe on the horizon, people had the same question: why isn't Intel sponsoring this or even building their own. It was speculated that this might get them into legal hot water with Nvidia, Google VS. Oracle was brought up, etc...
replies(1): >>39345317 #
my123 ◴[] No.39345317[source]
They financed the prior iteration of Zluda: https://github.com/vosen/ZLUDA?tab=readme-ov-file#faq

but then stopped

replies(1): >>39345409 #
formerly_proven ◴[] No.39345409[source]
> [2021] After some deliberation, Intel decided that there is no business case for running CUDA applications on Intel GPUs.

oof

replies(3): >>39345692 #>>39345753 #>>39346116 #
1. AtheistOfFail ◴[] No.39345753[source]
> After two years of development and some deliberation, AMD decided that there is no business case for running CUDA applications on AMD GPUs.

Oof x2