←back to thread

517 points xbar | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.258s | source
Show context
ajb ◴[] No.39146163[source]
The actual rulings can be found at https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192...

and a summary is: https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192...

Dissents etc can be found in the case page: https://www.icj-cij.org/case/192 - in particular the opinion of Judge Aharon Barak, the Israeli ad-hoc Judge (a peculiarity of the ICJ is that each side gets to add a judge, but it doesn't have much effect since there are 17 other judges). But interestingly Judge Barak ruled against Israel in the case of two measures, enforcement against Incitement and ensuring humanitarian aid.

I believe it's also available in French, for those more familiar with that language.

replies(7): >>39146237 #>>39146925 #>>39147067 #>>39148425 #>>39148514 #>>39150104 #>>39150978 #
throwaway421967 ◴[] No.39150104[source]
Since the comment that I replied to was flagged, I'm posting this here because it is simply a statement of facts.

- Judge Barak's numbers on civilian deaths on 7th october are simply wrong and could've been easily checked. 766 civilians were killed, 1200 was the total number of deaths (including armed forces).

- Israel's own numbers say "2 civilians killed for every one militant"[1], that's 66% in the Gaza offensive.

- 766 / 1200 = 63.8%

- 63.8% and 66% are indeed close numbers, don't see why would it be flagged.

Of course, the numbers claimed by other NGOs / UN make it worse. But Israel's numbers are sufficient to make that claim.

[1] - https://edition.cnn.com/2023/12/05/middleeast/israel-hamas-m...

replies(4): >>39151327 #>>39151574 #>>39151778 #>>39154637 #
xdennis[dead post] ◴[] No.39151327[source]
[flagged]
int_19h ◴[] No.39151397[source]
When Brits were firebombing German cities, that had very little to do with freeing anyone from anything. Even at the time it was recognized by many as an act of revenge, and it's hard to not take the same impression from how Israel is conducting itself in Gaza, especially given some telling remarks from Israeli leadership.
replies(3): >>39151482 #>>39151696 #>>39152234 #
JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.39151696[source]
> at the time it was recognized by many as an act of revenge

In part. Air power was new at the time, and there was legitimate strategic ambiguity around the military value of removing war factories’ workforces. (This is why Germany and Britain bombed by night while America bombed by day.)

replies(1): >>39151866 #
kilolima ◴[] No.39151866[source]
I'd be curious to see a citation for this claim if you remember it. Thanks!
replies(1): >>39152231 #
1. jdietrich ◴[] No.39152231[source]
The book Terror from the Sky: The Bombing of German Cities in World War II covers most of the major issues.

The key point of distinction between the American and British approach emerged through what the British euphemistically referred to as "dehousing" - the idea that destroying German housing stock would disrupt the operation of manufacturing, divert materials and labour away from military use and demoralise the population. On this premise, civilian casualties were merely the incidental consequence of destroying houses.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qchwt

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dehousing