←back to thread

517 points xbar | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.236s | source
Show context
ken47 ◴[] No.39150013[source]
I wish politics articles wouldn't make it to the top page of Hacker News. There's already enough political discussion in a million other places.
replies(4): >>39150142 #>>39150324 #>>39150579 #>>39150617 #
nomdep[dead post] ◴[] No.39150579[source]
[flagged]
dang ◴[] No.39150752[source]
That's not accurate.

It's common for people with strong feelings on a topic to leap to the conclusion that the mods are biased against their side and secretly supporting the opposite. This happens from every perspective on every divisive topic.

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

replies(1): >>39150833 #
nomdep ◴[] No.39150833[source]
You are right, it's unfair because there is no strong evidence to make that assertion.

I don't mind about what are your personal political affiliations or sympathies, however, I still maintain that this topic is textbook against the guidelines, and because of that I'm still afraid we will see post against candidate X in the front page in a few months. Time will tell.

replies(1): >>39150928 #
1. dang ◴[] No.39150928[source]
That's a common misunderstanding of HN's guidelines; what they say is that most stories about politics are off-topic, and of course most != all. This has been the case for a long time—see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4922426 for example, or https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17014869 for tons of other examples.

The question of how/where to draw the line is tough, but it's also one that we arrived at a relatively stable answer to a long time ago. I've written about this a bunch: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so....

I'm not saying we always make the right call—we don't, and anyhow people always disagree about what the right call is. But the underlying principles are at least pretty clear.